Case study · Austin, TX

Austin short-term rental revenue management: three real portfolios

Austin has been the cautionary tale of American short-term rentals for several years: supply grew faster than demand, and hosts who priced off habit watched revenue erode even in packed festival weeks. Three Austin portfolios appear in our published reports, and each tells a different version of making money in an oversupplied city.

Oversupply changes what good pricing means

When a market is short on supply, almost any pricing works. Austin is the opposite: the same downtown weekend can be sold out for one host and empty for another, purely on positioning. Festival and event weeks still create windfalls, but only for listings priced into them early, and the quiet stretches between events punish anyone still holding peak-week rates.

The three portfolios below entered management at different starting points, and their reports show different shapes of progress: one built its gains gradually, another moved sharply. All three are measured the same way, against the market score frozen for each on its first day.

The question Austin managers actually ask

It is usually some version of: can pricing alone still move the needle here, or is the market simply done? The published reports are our answer. Movement above a frozen baseline in a flat or falling market is revenue that operational effort alone does not produce, and it is visible in the documents below rather than asserted.

The reports, exactly as the client received them

Company names, owner names and addresses are redacted; every figure is untouched. Full-size viewer on the proof page. How the baseline works: the frozen baseline method.

Want this measurement run on your Austin portfolio?

The first step is a free revenue map built from your own numbers: where each listing sits against the homes it actually competes with, and what that gap is worth. No commitment, and the map is yours to keep either way.

Get my revenue map with Jack
Get my revenue map with Jack
Report